We are a New York software development company for funded teams that cannot hire fast enough, working as a dedicated squad, a full product build, or engineers embedded in your team. Our software development process covers discovery, architecture, web and mobile engineering, cloud and platform work, data and AI, sprint delivery, release, and handover.
Tell us what you want built.
A software development company is the partner you hire when one product feature or one internal tool is not the job: you need sustained engineering capacity across web, mobile, cloud, and data, led by people who own architecture and outcomes. We staff dedicated teams and embedded engineers for funded startups and enterprises, then ship on a weekly demo cadence under one named tech lead.
Post-seed and Series A teams that have product-market fit and a board-level roadmap, but not enough senior engineers to deliver it on time. A dedicated squad closes the gap without a six-month hiring cycle.
Established product orgs replatforming a legacy system, standing up a new line of business, or absorbing a delivery spike. We plug in engineers who pass your security review and join your standups, not a black-box offshore pod. Comparing vendors? See our ranking of enterprise software development companies.
When the work spans a web app, a mobile companion, a cloud backend, and a data layer, splitting it across four vendors creates four integration seams. One team that owns the whole surface removes them.
There are three honest ways to add engineering capacity, and they solve different problems. A dedicated team owns a slice of your roadmap end to end. A full-cycle build delivers a new product from discovery to production. Staff augmentation drops vetted engineers into the team you already run. Pick by the shape of the gap, not the size of the invoice.
| model | best when | who leads | typical horizon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dedicated team | You own the product but lack the headcount to ship the roadmap. | Our tech lead, your product owner | 1 quarter+ |
| Full-cycle build | A new product or platform needs to exist from zero. | Our tech lead end to end | 12-28 weeks |
| Staff augmentation | Your team and process are solid; you just need more senior hands. | Your engineering manager | flexible |
A cross-functional squad (lead, engineers, QA) that takes a defined slice of your roadmap and owns it through to production. They run your sprint ritual, join your tooling, and report against your metrics. You get a team that compounds context instead of resetting every contract. This is the right call when you have a product and a backlog but cannot hire fast enough to clear it.
Discovery, architecture, build, and launch for a product or platform that does not exist yet, spanning web, mobile, cloud, and data as needed. Closest to our SaaS development and mobile app development work, with one team owning the whole surface. Best when speed to a real, launched product matters more than internal headcount.
Vetted senior engineers who pass your interview bar and security review, then join your existing team, your repo, and your standups inside two weeks. You keep the roadmap and the rituals; we supply the hands. Best when your process is healthy and the only constraint is people. For front-end-heavy gaps, see React development.
Most software work lands in four practice areas, and a serious build usually touches more than one. We staff across all four so the seams between them stay inside one team, with a shared quality and security function that runs through every sprint rather than getting bolted on at the end.
react / next.js / node
Production web apps, dashboards, and platforms on TypeScript with React and Node.js. We build to the Core Web Vitals thresholds and follow the accessibility and DOM guidance on MDN Web Docs, so the front end is fast and usable on the first release, not a later cleanup pass. Pairs with our web development service.
swift / kotlin / react native
Native iOS and Android where the platform feel matters, cross-platform with React Native or Flutter where shared code wins. We design the mobile client and its backend services together so offline state, push, and auth are not afterthoughts. When mobile is the primary surface, our mobile app development team leads; otherwise it joins the product squad as one more practice under the same lead.
aws / kubernetes / ci-cd
Infrastructure as code, container orchestration on Kubernetes when the scale earns it, and managed services on AWS when it does not. CI/CD, observability, and a cost dashboard ship with the platform, because a system you cannot see or pay for predictably is a liability. Connects to our ERP development work for back-office systems.
postgres / pipelines / ml
Data pipelines, warehouses, and analytics layers on PostgreSQL and columnar stores, plus applied machine learning that ships into the product surface (search ranking, scoring, recommendations) rather than living in a notebook. The same data work feeds dashboards and a CRM development layer when customer records are the system of record.
Our process is five repeatable stages, and every one produces an artifact you can read: a scope document, an architecture record, a weekly recorded demo, a release note, and a handover pack. The point is not ceremony; it is that you can tell exactly where the work stands at any moment without asking.
Two-week sprint: requirements workshops, system-of-record mapping, risk register, and a scoped plan. For a dedicated team this defines the first quarter; for a full-cycle build it produces a fixed-bid proposal. Output is a written scope, not a verbal understanding.
Architecture decision records for every consequential choice (data model, tenancy, auth, deploy target). We document the "why" so the next engineer, ours or yours, can read the reasoning instead of reverse-engineering it. API contracts follow the patterns in the Google developer documentation style guide.
One to two week sprints, each ending in a recorded demo of real code in a real environment with a written what-shipped, what-slipped summary. Schema for any structured data on the product follows schema.org where it applies. No weekly demo means no invoice that week.
CI/CD with automated tests, staged rollouts, and a rollback path before anything reaches production. Observability and alerting are live at launch, not added after the first incident, so the team is never flying blind when a customer reports a bug.
Documented architecture, runbooks, and a knowledge-transfer session whenever you take a system in-house. The contract names who owns the code (you), who owns the infrastructure (you), and what handover looks like. No lock-in, no retainer trap.
Stack choice follows three things and never framework hype: your team's existing skills, the monthly operational cost, and who you can actually hire in your market. Our defaults are mature, well-documented tools a new engineer can read on day one, with room to reach for the specialized option only when a load test or a business requirement forces it.
| layer | default |
|---|---|
| Web front end | React / Next.js |
| Mobile | Swift / Kotlin / React Native |
| Backend | TypeScript / Python / Go |
| Database | PostgreSQL |
| Cache + queues | Redis |
| Analytics DB | ClickHouse / BigQuery |
| Cloud | AWS / GCP / Azure |
| Orchestration | Kubernetes / ECS |
| Billing | Stripe |
| Observability | Sentry + Datadog |
PostgreSQL handles most workloads teams assume need a specialized database, and Redis covers most of what teams reach for a message bus to do. We deviate (Kafka, a graph store, a managed vector database) only when the boring default provably fails a requirement, and an architecture decision record captures why.
For the same reason, we do not pick a language because it is fashionable. Node.js and Python cover most product work; Go shows up where a service is performance-critical. The test is whether a new hire in your city can read and own the code within a week, because the stack you cannot staff is the stack that stalls. For platform replatforms, see custom web platform.
The questions teams ask most before booking a scoping call: how this differs from custom software, which engagement model fits, how fast a team spins up, which stacks we cover, how we handle security, and how we price.
Custom software development is for a specific bespoke build: the internal tool, portal, or integration your SaaS stack cannot absorb, scoped as one defined project.
Software development as a service is broader: sustained engineering capacity across web, mobile, cloud, and data, delivered as a dedicated team or embedded engineers over months or quarters. If you have one well-defined thing to build, start with custom software development. If you have a roadmap and need a team to own a slice of it, you are in the right place.
Pick a dedicated team when you have a product and a backlog but cannot hire fast enough to ship it; the squad owns a slice of the roadmap end to end. Pick a full-cycle build when a new product or platform needs to exist from zero and speed to a launched version matters most.
Pick staff augmentation when your process and roadmap are healthy and the only gap is senior hands. Most clients start with one and shift as the work changes; the scoping call sorts which fits.
Staff augmentation engineers typically join your repo and standups within two weeks of the scoping call, once they clear your interview bar and security review. A dedicated team starts with a two-week discovery sprint, then ramps to full delivery in the following sprint. A full-cycle build opens with the same discovery sprint and produces a fixed-bid proposal before any production code is written. We do not promise a team tomorrow; we promise a real start date in the scope.
Web on React and Next.js with TypeScript; mobile on Swift, Kotlin, React Native, and Flutter; backends on Node.js, Python, and Go; data on PostgreSQL, Redis, ClickHouse, and BigQuery; cloud on AWS, GCP, and Azure with Kubernetes or ECS for orchestration.
We choose per engagement on three axes: your team's familiarity, operational cost, and hiring availability in your market. The stack you cannot staff is the stack that stalls, so we default to mature, well-documented tools and reach for the specialized option only when a requirement forces it.
Security runs through every sprint: code review, automated tests, and an OWASP ASVS-aligned pass, with least-privilege access, encryption in transit and at rest, and zero hardcoded secrets as the baseline. For regulated clients we add SOC 2 gap analysis, HIPAA, GDPR, or PCI scoping as applicable.
On ownership, every contract names you as the owner of the code, the infrastructure, and the documentation, with written exit clauses and a knowledge-transfer session if you take the system in-house. No lock-in, no ownership gray zone.
Every engagement is scoped, so we do not publish tiered packages: a two-engineer augmentation and a full-cycle multi-stack platform sit at very different costs, and a range would mislead more than it helps. Dedicated teams and retainers price monthly against the squad size and horizon. Full-cycle builds price against a written requirements document with a fixed bid plus an explicit change-request process. Book the scoping call; a written scope and quote land within two business days.
30-minute call to understand the roadmap, the team gap, and the constraints. Written scope and a quote within two business days. No proposal decks, no sales theater.
Published reviews from our Fiverr profile, reproduced word for word. 397 public reviews across 4 gigs, from clients in 36 countries. Read them all on Fiverr.
Working with this team felt like true partnership. They turned our vision into a polished platform and exceeded expectations. Highly Recommended!
What impressed us most was how quickly the seller understood the real problem behind our project rather than just building what was requested. The reservation platform feels like it was designed specifically around our restaurant operations and customer experience. Clean execution professional communication and a result that genuinely adds value to our business. Highly recommended.
What impressed me most was how quickly the idea turned into something that actually felt usable and complete. Communication was always clear, and every small detail was handled thoughtfully. Very satisfied with the final result.
I’ve worked with several developers over the years, but this project stood out because of the level of investigation and problem solving involved. What impressed me most was the willingness to understand the platform's logic before making changes. I would absolutely recommend working with them.
I think I gave the team a pretty big challenge, and I’m really happy with how everything’s turning out. They’ve been easy to work with, communication has been great, and they’ve been willing to make changes whenever I’ve asked. Looking forward to continuing the project.
Working with this team was a fantastic experience. The website turned out exactly how I envisioned, and every feature was implemented with great attention to detail. The final result looks clean, modern, and performs really well. I truly appreciate the professionalism and would definitely work together again on future updates. Highly recommended!
Reviews are reproduced as published on Fiverr, captured 2026-08-03. Fiverr shows the buyer's username and country publicly; no other client detail is used here.
115 people in New York, Delhi, Lucknow, London and Sydney, shipping ecommerce, web, software and mobile work for founder-led brands. Senior engineers only, no account-manager relay, and the same team from kickoff to launch.
Published · Last updated .
Pinch, scroll or double-tap to zoom · drag to pan
Where should we send the proposal?
Please enter your name and a valid email.
Any faster way to reach you? Optional.
Please fill in the one you picked.
