eLearning app development
Full-stack learning products from validation MVP to multi-tenant platform, instrumented for activation and completion from the first commit.
Ship a revenue-ready learning product →We build the learning platforms course businesses outgrow into — custom LMS builds, cohort-based course software, assessment engines, and mobile learning apps. SCORM/xAPI tooling, WCAG 2.2 accessibility, FERPA and COPPA-aware data handling, and checkout that actually converts.
Most learning businesses do not need another Teachable clone; they need the specific system their growth is stuck behind. Sometimes that is a course player that respects the learner, sometimes an assessment engine an institution will accept, sometimes a mobile app that survives a commute with no signal. Eight builds, each scoped as its own engagement or composed into a platform.
Full-stack learning products from validation MVP to multi-tenant platform, instrumented for activation and completion from the first commit.
Ship a revenue-ready learning product →Custom learning management systems: chapter navigation, progress tracking, certificates, instructor dashboards, org-level admin rollups.
Build the LMS your courses deserve →Hybrid architectures that keep best-in-class checkout and billing while a custom platform owns delivery, community, and credentials.
Escape the all-in-one ceiling →Weekly-pacing engines, cohort channels, drop-off alerts, and re-engagement flows. Cohort pacing is the single biggest completion lever we ship.
Run cohorts that finish together →One clean front door for learners: enrollment, progress, certificates, billing, and support in a single accessible interface.
Design a portal learners open daily →Question banks, timed assessments, auto-grading, attempt policies, and certificate gating tied to demonstrated mastery, not video watch-time.
Grade at scale without spreadsheets →Standards-based packaging, import pipelines, and learning-record instrumentation so your content ports across systems instead of dying in one.
Make your content portable →React Native learning apps with offline video, push-based pacing nudges, and full parity with the web platform. Built for the commute, not the demo.
Put the course in their pocket →EdTech is a standards-dense vertical. A consumer course business can ignore most of them; the moment a school district, a university, or an enterprise L&D team enters the pipeline, the security questionnaire arrives before the contract does. We architect for that day up front — compliance-aware from the first schema migration, so the paperwork is a formality rather than a rebuild.
We build import and export against SCORM for legacy institutional content and xAPI for modern learning-record streams. Your content ports in from an old LMS and ports out if you ever leave ours — no lock-in by file format.
Learning software has a legal and moral accessibility bar most SaaS never faces. We design against WCAG 2.2: keyboard-complete course players, captioned and transcribed video, focus-visible assessments, and contrast-checked design tokens baked into the UI/UX design system itself.
Education records and minors' data carry rules general software ignores. We build FERPA-aware record handling, COPPA-aware consent flows for under-13 audiences, and GDPR-aware retention and export. Aware means architected for — audit logs, role-based access, data-subject tooling — not a certification claim; your counsel and auditors certify.
LTI-friendly integration paths into Canvas, Blackboard, and Moodle for institutional sales. Stripe Billing for subscriptions, seat licensing, and dunning. Video on Mux or Cloudflare Stream for adaptive playback, per-viewer analytics, and DRM on premium catalogs.
The four problems that show up in nearly every edtech scoping call, and the specific system that fixes each. None of them are marketing problems; all of them are software problems wearing a marketing costume.
Self-paced courses leak learners silently. Low completion kills referrals, reviews, and the repeat purchase that funds the next course.
Cohort pacing, progress mechanics, and drop-off-triggered re-engagement. The course platform in our featured case study holds a 62% completion rate; the Boston archetype moved 38% to 71% after a cohort-pacing rebuild.
Teachable, Kajabi, and Thinkific bundle everything adequately and nothing excellently. At real revenue, checkout conversion, brand experience, and data access all hit walls at once.
Unbundle deliberately. Keep the best checkout and billing you can get, run learning on a custom platform, and sync the two with a boring, retry-safe webhook bridge. One customer identity across both systems, no all-in-one tax.
Districts and universities ask about FERPA posture, data residency, LTI integration, and accessibility before procurement will even schedule a call.
Compliance-aware architecture from the start: audit logs, RBAC, encryption at rest, learner-data export tooling, LTI-friendly integration paths, and a documentation pack that pre-answers the questionnaire. In the Boston archetype this motion 5x’d the institutional pipeline in six months.
Hours of HD course video on generic hosting means runaway bandwidth bills, piracy of premium catalogs, and buffering on the mobile networks where learners actually watch.
Purpose-built video infrastructure — Mux or Cloudflare Stream — with adaptive bitrate, signed playback URLs, DRM on premium tiers, and per-viewer engagement analytics that feed the completion mechanics rather than sitting in a dashboard.
EdTech platforms follow SaaS cost math, stage by stage. An MVP that takes a paying learner — course player, Stripe billing, basic auth, 5-10 core features — runs $30,000 to $80,000 over 10-16 weeks. A post-PMF platform with multi-tenancy, observability, and an admin panel runs $80,000 to $200,000 over 16-26 weeks. Scale-stage with SSO, RBAC, audit logs, and SOC 2 readiness runs $200,000 to $500,000 over 24-40 weeks, and enterprise multi-region builds cross $500,000 to $1M+. The full component-by-component breakdown, including the build-vs-buy table that routinely saves $150K-$410K on a scale-stage build, lives in our SaaS development cost guide.
| stage | edtech shape | timeline | market range |
|---|---|---|---|
| MVP | Course player, checkout, progress, certificates | 10-16 weeks | $30K-$80K |
| Post-PMF | Cohorts, community, instructor dashboard, multi-tenant | 16-26 weeks | $80K-$200K |
| Scale | SSO, RBAC, audit logs, LTI, SOC 2 readiness | 24-40 weeks | $200K-$500K |
| Enterprise | Multi-region, dedicated environments, custom integrations | 32-52 weeks | $500K-$1M+ |
Ranges match our SaaS development cost page — same math, edtech-shaped scope.
A course business hit the all-in-one ceiling at $40K MRR on Teachable. We unbundled: best-in-class checkout kept billing and customer records, a custom Next.js LMS ran the course player, progress, certificates, and community. Eighteen months later the platform sat at $310K MRR — 7.7x — with growth driven equally by enrollment volume (+240%) and pricing power from a new certificate tier.
$40K at month 1; $310K at month 18.
Against the industry 12-15% average. Completion drives referral and repeat purchase.
Monthly, on the membership tier. Certificate-track users churn at 1.8%; course-only at 4.6%.
Selling to institutions instead? See the Boston edtech SaaS archetype — $90K to $540K ARR in 18 months on FERPA-aware architecture, Canvas and Blackboard integration, and an institutional sales motion.
Five stages on a six-week delivery cadence. You see working software every Friday, not a status deck at the end.
A 30-minute call, then a written scope inside 48 hours of that first call: stage assessment, build-vs-buy recommendation, fixed-fee number. Week zero, no charge.
Weeks 1-2. Learner journey maps, course-player wireframes, accessibility-checked design tokens, and the data model for courses, progress, and entitlements. Design ends when engineers stop asking questions.
Six-week cadence blocks with a working demo every Friday. Checkout and entitlements first, course player second, assessments and certificates third — revenue-critical paths always land earliest.
Content migration, learner-account cutover with zero access loss, load-tested video delivery, and a rollback plan nobody should ever need. Launch week is planned in week one, not week last.
Post-launch, completion and activation data drive a monthly iteration loop: pacing experiments, assessment tuning, checkout tests. The platform compounds instead of decaying.
Opinionated defaults, revisited every six months. Build the course player, the pacing engine, and the assessment logic; buy auth, billing, and video — the buy column is where budgets are saved.
Senior engineers and designers out of the NY and Delhi HQs, honest remote-first since 2017. No fake local office, no bait-and-switch juniors after the sales call.
The NY-Delhi pairing gives US clients a same-day loop: decisions in your morning, built by your next one. UK teams get near-full-day coverage.
Every engagement runs the same six-week delivery cadence with Friday demos. Course businesses live on launch dates; so does our process.
Written scope and a fixed-fee number inside 48 hours of the first call. Our cost pages publish the same ranges we quote — no anchor games.
We operate our own ERP and client portals daily. We know what post-launch software life feels like because we live it — that experience ships in your admin panel.
An MVP, an LMS, a platform migration off an all-in-one. Fixed fee, written scope, six-week cadence blocks, Friday demos.
A dedicated pod iterating on the live platform: pacing experiments, new course formats, assessment tuning, institutional features as the pipeline demands them.
Senior engineers embedded in your existing team, on your standups and your repo. Useful when the roadmap outruns your hiring.
Every shape starts with the same scoped quote inside 48 hours. Budget math first: the SaaS development cost guide shows the ranges before you ever get on a call.
The scoping discipline that gets a revenue-ready product live in one quarter — the same playbook our edtech MVPs run on.
Activation math that maps one-to-one onto learner onboarding: the aha moment for a course platform is the first completed lesson.
How to choose the right mobile approach before committing a learning-app budget to the wrong architecture.
An MVP that takes a paying learner runs $30,000-$80,000. A post-PMF platform with cohorts, community, and multi-tenancy runs $80,000-$200,000. Scale-stage with SSO, audit logs, LTI, and SOC 2 readiness runs $200,000-$500,000; enterprise multi-region crosses $500K-$1M+. The component-level math is in our SaaS development cost guide, and we send a fixed-fee scope within 48 hours of a call.
An MVP course platform ships in 10-16 weeks; a post-PMF build with cohorts and instructor dashboards takes 16-26 weeks; scale-stage institutional platforms run 24-40 weeks. A hybrid migration off Teachable or Kajabi — checkout first, LMS second, certificates third — typically lands in 12 to 20 weeks depending on catalog depth. Everything runs on a six-week cadence with working demos every Friday.
We build FERPA and COPPA-aware architecture — access controls, audit logs, consent flows for minors, data-retention and export tooling — which is the engineering half of compliance. Certification and legal attestation belong to your counsel and auditors; no agency can truthfully sell you "FERPA certified" software. What we deliver is a platform that passes the security questionnaire and an auditor's review without a rebuild.
Next.js and React with TypeScript on the web, React Native for mobile learning apps, Postgres for courses, progress, and entitlements, Stripe Billing for subscriptions and seat licensing, and Mux or Cloudflare Stream for adaptive video with DRM on premium catalogs. We buy auth, billing, and video infrastructure and build the course player, pacing engine, and assessment logic — the parts that differentiate your product.
Yes. SCORM import matters when institutions hand you a decade of legacy packages; xAPI matters when you want granular learning records — every video pause, quiz attempt, and discussion post — feeding your completion analytics. We build both as first-class pipelines, not bolt-ons, so your content and your data stay portable across whatever LMS ecosystem your buyers already run.
Every build includes a stabilization window, then most clients move to the product-pod retainer: a monthly iteration loop driven by completion and activation data — pacing experiments, assessment tuning, checkout tests, institutional features as the sales pipeline demands them. You own the code, the infrastructure accounts, and the data from day one; the retainer is for compounding, not hostage-keeping.
Both, with different builds. Startups get the $30K-$80K MVP shape: prove demand before buying multi-tenancy and SSO you do not need yet. Course businesses at real revenue get the hybrid platform migration. Enterprises and institution-facing SaaS get the scale-stage shape: RBAC, audit logs, LTI integration, SOC 2 readiness. The expensive mistake at every stage is building for a different stage than the one you are in.
Stay on the all-in-one while it is not your ceiling — it is the right first platform. Move when the walls show up together: checkout conversion trailing what a best-in-class checkout would do, no way to ship certificates or proctored assessments, community bolted on awkwardly, and your data split across four dashboards. That is usually around meaningful monthly revenue, and the hybrid unbundle — not a big-bang rebuild — is how we de-risk it.
A 30-minute audit call on your platform, your completion numbers, and your ceiling. You leave knowing whether the answer is an MVP, a hybrid migration, or an institutional build — and we follow up with a scoped, fixed-fee quote within 48 hours.
Published .
Share your name & email so we can follow up — even if we miss you live.
Please enter your name and a valid email.