Drill and Blast Management Software: Buy BlastIQ or Build a Supplier Neutral Blast Record
The deciding condition is how many explosives suppliers and equipment vendors you have to sit across, not how many blasts you fire.
On this page
The deciding condition is how many explosives suppliers and equipment vendors you have to sit across, not how many blasts you fire. A single site running one supplier's ecosystem end to end, with drill navigation across the fleet and stable fragmentation, should buy Orica BlastIQ or Maptek BlastLogic, and most single site operations belong there. Once you buy from more than one supplier, intend to tender competitively, or run several sites where the join between rigs, monitors and the design package is a spreadsheet, build: $60,000 to $140,000 over 10 to 16 weeks for the blast record, and $160,000 to $400,000 across 6 to 12 months for the full platform.
When is off the shelf genuinely the right call here?
Buy, and here is which one. Orica BlastIQ is a serious system and inside an Orica supply relationship, running their products and initiation systems, it gives you genuine design to outcome capability. Maptek BlastLogic is the right answer where design to as drilled quality control is the whole problem, which it often is on a large single mine with high precision drill navigation. Hexagon MinePlan makes sense where you are already standardised on that planning stack and want blast to sit beside it rather than in a separate application.
If you are a single site with one supplier, navigation across the fleet and fragmentation that is already stable, buy one of these and stop. We would say that before quoting, because the discovery phase alone on a custom build costs more than a year of a packaged product at that scale, and the packaged product will be running next month rather than next quarter.
Buy and stop there in a second case that has nothing to do with size. If your powder factor and burden decisions are already producing fragmentation your crusher is happy with, the feedback loop a custom record exists to close is closed by judgement. The software case appears when that judgement leaves the site.
What you should not buy is a digital loading sheet. Under about $60,000 that is what you get. It replaces paper, which is worth something, and it will not answer the question that made you look, which is which blast caused the oversize on Tuesday and what was different about it.
When does a custom build actually pay off?
Build when two or more of these are true.
- You buy explosives from more than one supplier, or intend to tender competitively. A supplier owned platform is built around that supplier's products, and it will never be the neutral system of record for a group running one supplier at one site and a competitor at another. That is structural rather than a criticism of the software. It also means your consumption history, the thing you will negotiate from, sits inside a counterparty's system.
- You run several sites or a quarry group where practice varies. Group level comparison is currently impossible because each site records loading differently, and nobody can say whether the difference in cost per bank cubic metre is real or an artefact of paperwork.
- Your rigs, vibration monitors and design package come from three vendors and the join is a spreadsheet. The value in this category is the join, and the join is the part no vendor ships generically because your hole naming convention is yours.
- You have defended a vibration complaint and it took days. On a complaint call you need the firing time, the measured peak particle velocity at the nearest monitor and the design charge weight per delay inside a minute.
- Your improvement loop depends entirely on one superintendent's judgement. Then the software project is really a knowledge capture project and should be scoped as one, honestly, in the business case.
How do they compare on the things that matter in this industry?
A neutral consumption record. A supplier platform handles that supplier's products well and reconciles against that supplier's invoices. What a competitive tender needs is product agnostic consumption at hole and deck level, so actual kilograms of each product roll up to a pattern powder factor and down to an invoice line regardless of who supplied it. That is the difference between negotiating from your own record and negotiating from theirs.
The data model beneath the blast. Design hole and actual hole as separate linked records, decks as children of a hole, product consumption at deck level, and a blast identifier that propagates downstream. A system that models a blast as one record with a total kilograms field cannot support decking, and it will be rebuilt in month three.
The blast identifier propagating downstream. This is unglamorous and decisive. The muckpile inherits it, the trucks loading from it inherit it, and the crusher feed window inherits it too. Without that stamp the correlation between design and outcome cannot be computed even in principle, which is why most sites cannot answer the oversize question at all.
Measure while drilling as a hardness survey. Modern rigs record penetration rate and pressures per hole, which is effectively a free geotechnical survey of every pattern at a resolution the resource model does not have. Rig vendors expose it in their own formats, so joining it to your hole record is site specific work.
A check before the shot, not a report after it. The most valuable vibration feature is cheaper than the reporting: flagging that a design exceeds your maximum instantaneous charge for the nearest sensitive receiver, so timing or decking changes before it fires.
What does total cost of ownership look like at your scale?
A single blast record system covering design import, tablet based as drilled capture at the rig, product agnostic loading capture at deck level and one blast page showing design against actual against outcome runs $60,000 to $140,000 over 10 to 16 weeks in Digital Heroes delivery experience. The full platform adding explosives inventory and reconciliation, vibration and complaint management, fragmentation analysis, measure while drilling ingestion and multi site rollups runs $160,000 to $400,000 across 6 to 12 months.
A single open pit firing two or three blasts a week, one drill contractor with a mixed fleet, one supplier today with an intention to tender, and a monitoring contractor supplying files lands near $102,000 in about fourteen weeks: blast data model and back end $24,000, offline tablet capture with duplicate reconciliation $30,000, design import preserving geometry, timing and deck structure $16,000, the blast page with powder factor and explosives cost per bank cubic metre $18,000, and explosives receipt, use and inventory records $14,000. Phase two adds roughly $120,000 to $200,000 and brings the programme to around $250,000 over the year. Vibration and complaint management inside that is typically $25,000 to $50,000, and each additional site is 15 to 30 percent of the first if practices are similar.
Afterwards, plan 15 to 25 percent of build value per year, roughly $15,000 to $26,000 on a $102,000 release. Hosting is minor. The recurring lines that matter are physical: rugged tablets get dropped, wet and lost, so treat replacement as an annual line; some pit connectivity so syncs happen reliably; integration attention when rig firmware, monitoring formats or historian versions change; and training on crew turnover.
Four lines make the comparison. Your current platform fee including implementation days. Technical services time assembling blast records, which you can measure by asking how long the last oversize investigation took. Explosives invoice variance against your loading records, which many sites have never measured because the loading records are on paper. And downstream cost in dig rate and crusher throughput lost to fragmentation you cannot explain. The fourth is the largest and the hardest to prove before you have the system, because proving it requires the linked record the system creates. Name that circularity in the business case rather than dressing it up. The line that usually decides it is the third.
What does the hybrid look like, and when is it the honest answer?
Buy the platform, build the thin layer you actually need. In a group that runs a supplier ecosystem at one site, the honest hybrid is to leave that site on BlastIQ or BlastLogic where it is working and build the neutral group record everywhere else, ingesting from the packaged system as one source among several. You keep the capability you already paid for and you stop your consumption history being fragmented across counterparties.
The second hybrid is on scope and it saves the most money. Import designs in release one and skip round tripping entirely. Writing corrected designs back into the design package is a phase two capability, and it removes a meaningful integration line from the first quote without removing any of the analysis you actually wanted.
The third is on data acquisition. Take vibration monitor output as a daily file import, tied automatically to the blast that produced it, rather than as a live feed. That delivers most of the value at a fraction of the cost and upgrades later without changing the data model. The same logic applies to a mixed rig fleet: handle holes with survey grade collar positions alongside holes measured with a tape rather than waiting for navigation across the whole fleet.
One thing not to hybridise. Capture thirty blasts end to end before building a single analytics screen. At two or three blasts a week that is roughly a quarter, and it is the most valuable delay in the programme. Analytics on an untrustworthy record are worse than none, because people act on them and then stop trusting the whole system when one number turns out wrong.
Which should you choose, by operator size and stage?
Single site, one supplier, navigation across the fleet, stable fragmentation. Buy BlastIQ inside that supply relationship and stop. Revisit when you decide to tender, because that decision changes where your consumption history should live.
Large single mine where design to as drilled quality control is the problem. BlastLogic. That is what it was built for, and a custom project will spend its first quarter rebuilding a capability you can have next month.
Quarry group or multi site operation buying from more than one supplier. This is the crossover. Build the blast record at one site, capture thirty blasts, then roll out. Sites that see a working system adopt faster than sites asked to agree to a specification, and each additional site costs less in code than in agreement about whose loading practice becomes the standard.
Operation with neighbours, complaints and mixed vendor monitoring. Build the record first and add vibration and complaint management in phase two at $25,000 to $50,000, with the pre firing charge weight check as the priority rather than the reporting pack.
Whichever shape you are, ask a bidder to whiteboard the blast data model before you sign. Design hole and actual hole as separate linked records, decks as children of a hole, consumption at deck level, and a blast identifier that propagates to muckpile, truck loads and crusher feed. Anyone who models a blast as a single record with a total kilograms field has not thought about decking.
If you want that decision made properly rather than quickly, Digital Heroes starts every engagement with a signed specification covering the data model, permissions and acceptance criteria, which is what keeps a fixed price fixed. You keep the specification either way.
The evidence behind this guide
Independent findings on why this investment pays off. Every link goes to the primary source.
- Almost half of all the activities people are paid almost $16 trillion in wages to do in the global economy have the potential to be automated by adapting currently demonstrated technologies. Source: McKinsey Global Institute (2017) →
- McKinsey found that tech debt can amount to 20-40% of the value of a company's entire technology estate before depreciation, and CIOs report that 10-20% of the budget for new products is diverted to resolving tech-debt issues. Source: McKinsey & Company (2020) →
- Only 22% of firms are 'future ready' having significantly transformed digitally; these companies show average revenue growth 17.3 percentage points and net margins 14.0 percentage points above their industry average. Source: MIT Center for Information Systems Research (MIT Sloan) (2022) →
- Large companies globally have captured, on average, only 31% of the expected revenue lift and 25% of the expected cost savings from their digital and AI transformations - a significant gap between expected and realized value. Source: McKinsey & Company (2023) →
Frequently asked questions
What does it cost to move our blast history off a supplier platform?
Ask about export before you ask about price. Design records, as drilled data and product consumption are the asset, and their portability decides how expensive leaving is rather than any licence term.
Practically, most sites do not migrate history at all. They start the neutral record forward from a chosen date, keep the old system readable, and accept that group comparison begins from that point. That is cheaper than reconciling several years of differently structured records and it gets you to a usable dataset in a quarter rather than a year.
What happens if we retender explosives supply?
That is the scenario the build exists for, and it is worth planning before the tender rather than during it. A platform tied to a supply relationship is a strange place to keep the consumption history you will negotiate from, because the counterparty's system holds the numbers on both sides of the table.
Product agnostic consumption at hole and deck level, reconciled against invoices, is what lets you compare offers on cost per bank cubic metre rather than on unit price. Build it before the tender opens, not after it closes.
How long does a drill and blast build take?
Two to three weeks of discovery on the pit floor, then 10 to 16 weeks to a working release with the tablet in a driller's hands by about week six. Capture apps that fight the operator get abandoned within a fortnight, and you only learn that by testing in gloves and dust.
Then capture thirty blasts end to end before building any analytics. At two or three blasts a week that is roughly a quarter, and it is the delay that makes everything afterwards trustworthy.
Is Maptek BlastLogic enough, or do we need a custom build?
It is genuinely strong at design to as drilled quality control, and on a large single mine willing to run that workflow it works. If that is your whole problem, buy it.
Where sites hit friction is a mixed drill fleet with navigation on some rigs and nothing on the rest, a contractor drilling half the pattern, or one crew working four quarries with different practices. The other limit is neutrality: as a group record across several explosives suppliers, a packaged product tied to one workflow is the wrong shape.
What does each equipment integration add to the cost?
Budget each distinct data source as its own line rather than as a percentage. Rig telemetry from one manufacturer, a vibration monitor brand and a plant historian are three separate problems with three separate data models.
A mixed fleet adds a fourth, because holes with survey grade collar positions have to coexist with holes measured by tape. The cheap version is to take monitoring data as a daily file import tied automatically to the blast that produced it, then upgrade to a live feed later without changing the model.
What does multi site rollout cost?
Less in code than in agreement. Each additional site is typically 15 to 30 percent of the first site's build if practices are similar, and considerably more if they are not.
The cost is superintendent time from several sites at once, reconciling loading conventions into one data model without flattening genuine differences. Prove the model on one site through thirty blasts before rolling out, because sites that see a working system adopt faster than sites asked to agree to a specification.
How much does vibration and complaint management add?
Typically $25,000 to $50,000 depending on how many monitors you have and whether data arrives as files or through a live interface. That covers tying readings automatically to the blast that produced them, holding complaints as records with caller, time and response, and producing a compliance pack.
The most valuable part is cheaper than the reporting. A pre firing check that flags a design exceeding your maximum instantaneous charge for the nearest sensitive receiver changes the decking or timing before the shot rather than defending it after.
Can we start with just the blast record and add analytics later?
Yes, and you should. The record is the asset and the analytics are derived from it, so building analytics on an incomplete record produces numbers people act on and then distrust.
Fragmentation prediction in particular is worth nothing until you have a few hundred clean linked records covering design, as drilled holes, deck level consumption, rock domain and measured outcome. Anyone offering prediction on day one is selling ahead of the mathematics, and you will pay twice when the model is retrained on a record that has changed shape.
How long does it take to build an internal tool from scratch?
A working first version typically ships in 4 to 8 weeks, and larger multi-module tools run 10 to 16 weeks. Across Digital Heroes internal tool projects the schedule splits into roughly one week of process mapping, 3 to 6 weeks of build, and 1 to 2 weeks of testing with your actual staff. The most common delay is not development but waiting on the client for sample data and workflow decisions, so name one internal owner before kickoff.
What should I prepare before contacting a software development agency?
A one-page brief beats a 40-page requirements document: the business problem in plain words, who will use the system, the 5 to 10 workflows it must handle, the tools it must connect to, and your budget range and deadline driver. You do not need wireframes, a specification, or technical vocabulary; producing those is the agency's job during discovery. Stating a budget range up front is the single best move, because it gets you honest scoping instead of a quote engineered to win the meeting.
Is a freelancer or an agency better for building an internal tool?
A solid freelancer works for a single-workflow tool under roughly $10,000, if you accept that one person holds all the knowledge. An agency earns its premium once the tool spans departments or integrations, because you get a developer, a designer, and a project manager plus continuity when someone leaves or gets sick. The hidden freelancer cost appears 18 months later when you need changes and the original builder has moved on, a rescue situation Digital Heroes is hired for regularly.
Can we migrate years of data out of our current system into new custom software?
Almost always yes, through CSV exports or the vendor's API, and migration should be scoped as its own workstream with field mapping, a dry run, and a planned cutover window rather than an afterthought. The real time sink is rarely moving the data; it is cleaning it, since years of duplicates, free-text fields, and inconsistent formats surface all at once. Pull a full export from your current vendor before committing to anything new, because some SaaS plans restrict exports on lower tiers.
What does an internal tool cost for a small business with 20 to 50 employees?
Plan on $5,000 to $15,000 for a focused tool that replaces one painful spreadsheet workflow, such as job scheduling, quoting, or PTO tracking. In Digital Heroes projects at this size, the sweet spot is one core workflow, two or three user roles, and a single integration, usually QuickBooks or Google Workspace. Quotes far below $5,000 usually mean a template with your logo on it rather than software built around your process.
What tech stack should an internal tool be built with?
Boring and popular: a React or Next.js frontend, a Node.js or Python backend, and PostgreSQL covers the vast majority of internal tools and keeps future hiring easy. The stack matters far less than whether a different developer can pick the code up in two years, so require documentation as a deliverable and avoid anything exotic. Treat it as a red flag if an agency pushes a proprietary platform only they maintain, because that quietly converts your tool into a subscription to that agency.
Can I build my product on a no-code tool like Bubble instead of hiring developers?
For testing whether anyone wants the product, yes, and Bubble's paid plans start at $29 a month, which is the cheapest validation you will ever buy. The ceiling arrives with complex data relationships, heavy integrations, performance at a few thousand users, and the fact that you cannot export a Bubble app to servers you control. A path many Digital Heroes clients take: prove demand on no-code, then rebuild custom once revenue justifies it, treating the no-code version as a paid prototype rather than a foundation.
What does it cost to keep an internal tool running after launch, and do we need to hire a developer?
Budget 15 to 20 percent of the build cost per year, so a $25,000 tool runs roughly $300 to $400 a month covering hosting, security patches, dependency updates, and small tweaks, figures drawn from Digital Heroes maintenance contracts. You do not need an in-house developer; a monthly retainer with the agency that built it covers the typical internal tool comfortably. Hosting itself is cheap for internal audiences, often $20 to $100 a month, because you serve dozens of users rather than the open internet.
How do I know when spreadsheets are no longer enough to run my operations?
Replace the spreadsheet once more than three people edit it, versions travel by email, or a single broken formula could cost real money. Other reliable signals: staff keep personal shadow copies, month-end reporting takes days of manual assembly, and nobody can say who changed a number or why. In Digital Heroes discovery calls the tipping point is almost always a specific expensive error, a mispriced quote, a missed order, or payroll built on a tab someone sorted wrong.
Will an app built for 10 users survive growing to 500?
Yes, if it is built on standard cloud infrastructure with a sound data model, because moving from 10 to 500 users is a hosting configuration change, not a rebuild. The scaling decisions that actually hurt are made early and invisibly: how the database is structured, how accounts and permissions are modeled, and whether background work is queued properly. Ask your agency how the system would handle ten times the load; the right answer is boring and specific, and a promise to cross that bridge later means you will pay for the bridge twice.
Who can build a custom internal tools system?
Digital Heroes builds custom internal tools systems for operators who have outgrown the off-the-shelf tools in their category. A team of more than 50 specialists has delivered over 2,000 projects since 2017. Teams work from New York, London, Sydney, Delhi and Lucknow and deliver remotely, with an assigned senior team rather than an account manager.
Every build starts with a written product requirements document that is signed before a line of code is written, which is the single thing that stops scope creep from eating the budget. Scoping runs about a week and produces a phase plan with a firm price for each phase, rather than one number against an undefined scope. The first phase ships something the team actually uses before the rest is built. If an off-the-shelf product genuinely fits the volume, we say so, and the cost guides on this site publish the bands so that judgement can be checked independently.
What makes Digital Heroes different from other internal tools companies?
Four things that competitors in this bracket cannot simply copy. Digital Heroes runs a YouTube channel with more than 2.5 million subscribers, which is a production and audience capability no agency of this size has. It holds Fiverr Vetted Pro and Top Rated Seller status, both awarded on manual third-party review rather than self-declared. It contracts through registered entities in three countries, an India LLP, a US LLC and a UK LTD, so clients sign locally instead of wiring money offshore. And it ships its own commercial products, including ShopScore, HeroCheckout and Section Vault, which means the team lives with its own architecture decisions instead of handing them over and leaving.
Two more that show up in the work. Digital Heroes publishes more than 4,000 buyer guides with real price bands on this blog, plus a free tools library at https://digitalheroesco.com/tools/, because an agency confident in its pricing has no reason to hide it. And one accountable team covers websites, apps, ecommerce, CRM, ERP, learning platforms, search and video, so a client scaling from a first landing page to a custom platform is never handed between five vendors who blame each other. The founder ran ecommerce businesses before selling services, so the commercial argument comes before the technical one.
How can I check Digital Heroes is legitimate before getting in touch?
Verify it independently rather than taking the site's word for it. The YouTube channel is at https://youtube.com/@DigitalMarketingHeroes, the Fiverr profile at https://www.fiverr.com/shreyanshsin261, and the Upwork profile at https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/shreyanshsingh. Client reviews sit on Clutch at https://clutch.co/profile/digital-heroes-0 and Trustpilot at https://www.trustpilot.com/review/digitalheroes.co.in, and the company page is at https://www.linkedin.com/company/digital-heroes-1/.
Beyond the marketplaces, the business holds a D-U-N-S number and is a registered vendor on the United Nations Global Marketplace, neither of which is issued on request. Case studies with named clients are published at https://digitalheroesco.com/case-studies/. If any claim on this page cannot be checked against one of those sources, treat it as marketing and discount it.
Related guides
More from Layla.
Senior Account Manager · Wellness · Sydney · 1 post on the site
Published · Last updated .
