Underground Mine Personnel Tracking Software: Custom Build or Buy Newtrax
Buy. If you are commissioning a new mine or a major expansion and can standardise on one vendor stack, Newtrax, Mobilaris, Sandvik OptiMine, Strata Worldwide or Becker will give you an integrated product with support and a roadmap.
On this page
Buy. If you are commissioning a new mine or a major expansion and can standardise on one vendor stack, Newtrax, Mobilaris, Sandvik OptiMine, Strata Worldwide or Becker will give you an integrated product with support and a roadmap. Build only when two or more generations of tracking hardware are already underground and replacing them is not fundable.
What the off the shelf products actually do well
Four twelve in the morning. Smoke is reported near the workshop on the 720 level and the control room operator needs one number: how many people are underground. The lamp room board says sixty three, timekeeping says sixty eight were rostered, the contractor supervisor thinks nine went down at half past three, and the tracking system installed in 2019 shows forty one because it never covered the stopes. That is the scene, and it is not caused by bad products.
Newtrax, Mobilaris Mining Intelligence, Strata Worldwide, Becker Mining Systems, Sandvik OptiMine and Matrix Design Group all do serious work here. Mobilaris in particular is strong at assembling a situational picture from mixed inputs. Their hardware is intrinsically safe and approved for the atmospheres it operates in, which is a certification burden nothing you commission will carry. Their positioning engines are proven, their tags survive a cap lamp's life underground, and their support teams have stood in a control room during a real event.
If you are sinking a new decline or funding a major expansion, buy one of those stacks whole. An integrated product with a roadmap beats an integration project, and a custom build in that situation reinvents infrastructure for no gain. The same applies at the small end: a single decline operation whose only requirement is statutory tag tracking has a genuinely simple problem and should buy the simple answer.
Where they stop: presence is evidence, not a flag
Here is the specific workflow the products model badly, and it is the only one that matters at four in the morning.
A tag board tells you who collected a lamp. It does not tell you who is still below at shift change, who went up for a break and never returned, or who is a visitor escorted by a supervisor who then went to a different level. It is a check in system, and check in systems fail in exactly the situation they exist for, because during an evacuation nobody updates the board.
Vendor systems replace the board with a screen, and the screen shows tags. The trouble is that your mine holds several position models at once. Leaky feeder gives zone presence along a cable. Wifi gives an access point association that may be a hundred metres from where the person stands. Ultra wideband gives metre level accuracy in the areas where somebody paid to install it. Vehicle telemetry gives a machine position that implies an operator position, unless the operator got out. Each of those arrived with its own vendor, its own model and its own screen, and each product assumes you are standardising on it.
What none of them does is treat presence as a derived state with a confidence level. A person is underground because a tag was read at the portal, was seen at a level reader forty minutes ago, has a rostered shift that has not ended, and has not been read at an exit. Each of those is evidence. The control room screen should show the derived count, the confidence, and specifically the people whose evidence is stale, because those are the ones a supervisor phones first. A single confident number the system cannot support is more dangerous than the tag board, because it invites a decision the data does not justify.
The second gap is the roster. Tracking says who was seen. The roster and the competency record say who should be there and whether they are qualified for that area. At most sites those two systems have never been introduced, and contractors make it worse because their crews are managed on a separate induction spreadsheet.
The arithmetic: per person licensing against a build
Tracking platforms license per tracked person per month, often with a separate charge per network node and a maintenance percentage on the hardware. Take the numbers from your own contract, and count contractors, because contractor headcount swings and vendors bill it either way.
Run it. At two hundred and fifty tracked persons and $12 a person per month you are at $36,000 a year, and no build competes with that. At one thousand four hundred tracked persons across three operations you are at roughly $201,600 a year, or a million across five years, and you still have three separate screens because each site standardised on a different vendor.
The crossover sits between seven hundred and one thousand tracked persons, and it moves down sharply on a single condition: two or more generations of tracking hardware underground with no fundable path to replacing them. A mine with a Becker leaky feeder from 2011, Newtrax tags on the loaders and a wifi network the information technology department owns is not a candidate for a clean stack. Ripping and replacing across forty kilometres of development is a capital project no board approves for a software benefit, so the honest question is what you build above what you already own.
What a custom build actually costs
From Digital Heroes delivery experience, an evacuation and mustering layer runs $80,000 to $180,000 and ships in 14 to 20 weeks. That covers ingestion adapters for each existing tracking source, a canonical person and asset identity so one worker is one worker across cap lamp tag, vehicle login and roster, a spatial model expressed as zones with connectivity and egress rather than coordinates, presence with confidence, and the incident controller screen. A full platform adding equipment tracking and utilisation, zone access enforcement, contractor onboarding, shift reporting and historical playback for investigation runs $200,000 to $500,000 over 9 to 15 months.
Tracking hardware, readers and network extension are site infrastructure and sit outside those numbers entirely. Any developer folding them into a software quote is disguising the comparison.
Two lines will be missing anyway. Data migration runs 10 to 25 percent of the build, and here it is not records but the zone graph: turning survey data and level plans into zones with connectivity and egress routes is proper work rather than a data import, and somebody on your side has to own it as levels change. A spatial model nobody maintains is worse than no model within two years. Year two runs 15 to 20 percent of build cost annually, covering new hardware arriving through capital projects, protocol changes, and the mine simply growing.
The four situations where building wins
Regulatory fit. The Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 2006 pushed wireless communication and electronic tracking into underground coal in the United States, with emergency response plans approved under the Part 75 rules and refuge alternatives carrying their own requirements. Other jurisdictions impose their own duty to account for persons underground, and the detail differs between coal and hard rock and between countries, so confirm yours with a regulatory specialist. What every version has in common is that the obligation is to account for people, not to display tags, and accounting for people means joining tracking to the roster.
Scale economics. Past roughly eight hundred tracked persons, particularly across several operations, the per person licence exceeds what owning the integration costs, and group level assurance is still a set of emailed spreadsheets.
A workflow that is your competitive advantage. An evidence based presence model with confidence and staleness is not a feature anyone sells. It is a way of running a control room, and it is what turns a muster into a decision rather than a phone round.
Integration sprawl across three or more systems. Leaky feeder, wifi, ultra wideband, vehicle telemetry, timekeeping and the induction and competency register. When one worker exists as six identities across six systems, the reconciliation happens in an emergency, which is the worst possible time.
How to decide in a week
Run this test rather than reading more vendor material. Schedule an emergency exercise with your response team and, at the moment of declaration, ask the control room for a named list of everyone underground with their last known zone. Time it to the second. Then compare that list against the lamp room, against timekeeping and against the contractor supervisor's count, and record every person who appears in one source and not another.
If the named list arrives inside three minutes and the sources agree, your existing system is doing its job and a licence renewal is the right decision. If reconciliation takes longer than the exercise itself, you have your business case and it is written in your own incident log rather than in a brochure.
Then buy a paid discovery phase rather than a build. Digital Heroes writes a signed product requirements document before any code exists, covering the presence model, the identity resolution rules across sources, the zone graph structure and the acceptance criteria including degraded mode behaviour. You own that specification and can take it to any firm on your shortlist. We contract through India LLP, US LLC and UK LTD entities so intellectual property assigns under your own law, and we have delivered more than 2,000 projects with a named team you meet before signing.
We are the wrong firm if you want proximity detection, collision avoidance, gas monitoring, ventilation control or refuge life support built or commanded by custom software. Those are certified safety systems with their own testing regimes and legal standing. Our build reads their state, displays it and alerts on it, and any developer who offers to reimplement them because it is the same tags is telling you they do not understand the liability.
Book a 30-minute call with Digital Heroes and get a written plan and a fixed quote within 48 hours.
The evidence behind this guide
Independent findings on why this investment pays off. Every link goes to the primary source.
- Only 16% of respondents said their organizations' digital transformations had successfully improved performance and equipped them to sustain gains over the long term; even in digitally savvy industries such as high tech, media, and telecom, self-reported success rates did not exceed 26%. Source: McKinsey & Company (2018) →
- McKinsey found that tech debt can amount to 20-40% of the value of a company's entire technology estate before depreciation, and CIOs report that 10-20% of the budget for new products is diverted to resolving tech-debt issues. Source: McKinsey & Company (2020) →
- In an RCT, text-message reminders (11.7% missed) were non-inferior to telephone reminders (10.2% missed; difference not significant, within the 2% non-inferiority margin) but far cheaper - total cost EUR 230 for SMS versus EUR 8,910 for telephone over 6 months - making SMS more cost-effective. Source: BMC Health Services Research / PubMed Central (Junod Perron et al.) (2013) →
- Digital Champions expect to achieve about 16% in cost savings and around 15% in revenue gains from digital operations over five years; the study surveyed 1,155 manufacturing executives across 26 countries. Source: PwC / Strategy& (2018) →
Frequently asked questions
How much does custom underground personnel tracking software cost
An evacuation and mustering layer runs $80,000 to $180,000 over 14 to 20 weeks, with tracking hardware and network extension costed separately as site infrastructure. Headcount barely moves the figure. What does is the number of distinct tracking vendors and hardware generations you need to read, because each protocol is real work and some of the older ones are undocumented.
Can custom software replace proximity detection or gas monitoring
No, and a developer who offers to should be removed from your shortlist. Those are certified safety systems with their own approvals, testing regimes and legal standing. A custom build reads their state, shows it beside the tracking picture and raises alerts on it. It does not command them, and every screen should make clear it is an advisory view backed by the statutory procedure.
Should we replace Newtrax or Mobilaris with a custom system
Almost never. Those products are strong and their hardware carries certifications nothing you commission will hold. The question worth asking is what you build above them, particularly when you also run a leaky feeder from an earlier era and a wifi network the information technology department owns. Keep the vendors, own the model, and make the adapters yours so the next negotiation is not a hostage situation.
Why does the shift roster matter for a tracking system
Because tracking tells you who was seen and the roster tells you who should be there, and the gap between those lists is the whole emergency management problem. The join also pays off daily: it enforces zone access rules so someone without current competency for a shaft area triggers an alert, and it catches the visitor whose escort has moved to another level.
What should the control room screen show during an incident
Three lists, not a map with dots. People confirmed at a muster point or inside a refuge chamber, people moving toward one, and people whose last read is stale and who therefore need a physical search. A map is useful afterwards. Under pressure the incident controller needs to know who to phone and who to send someone after, and lists answer that faster than geography.
What happens if the network or the server fails during an emergency
The system must degrade visibly rather than silently. Show the last known state with an obvious timestamp, keep working from locally cached data where possible, and never present a stale figure as current. Test that behaviour with the emergency response team during a scheduled exercise. A screen that quietly freezes on old numbers is more dangerous than one that plainly says it has lost its feed.
How do we merge data from leaky feeder, wifi and ultra wideband
Through one adapter per source feeding a canonical identity and a zone based spatial model. Zones matter more than coordinates underground: knowing somebody is in the east drive between two egress points is more useful than a position estimate with an unstated error of eighty metres. Each source contributes evidence with its own accuracy, and presence is derived from the combination rather than from whichever read arrived last.
Who owns the integration adapters if an agency builds this
You should, along with the repository, the data and the infrastructure accounts, and it belongs in the contract before kickoff. At Digital Heroes the code is yours from the first commit. The adapters matter especially here, because they are what stops the next vendor negotiation becoming a lock in problem. Owning them is what makes your hardware choices reversible.
How long does it take to build an evacuation and mustering system
Fourteen to twenty weeks for the first release. The schedule risk is rarely software. It is the zone graph, because somebody has to turn survey data and level plans into zones with connectivity and egress routes, and that requires mine planning time rather than developer time. Book it formally into the plan and name the person who will maintain it as levels change.
Can we start with mustering only and add the rest later
Yes, and you should. Presence, the roster join and the incident controller screen deliver the value that justifies the project. Equipment utilisation, productivity analytics and historical playback can wait until the emergency picture is trusted by the people who use it at four in the morning. Trust in this category is earned in exercises, and it is easier to earn on a small system.
Should I ask for a fixed price or pay the agency hourly?
Fixed price for the first version, hourly or retainer for what comes after launch. A fixed-scope, fixed-price V1 puts the estimation risk on the agency, which is exactly where you want it while trust is unproven; hourly billing on an unscoped greenfield build is a blank check. After launch, flip it, because maintenance and small features arrive unpredictably and fixed-pricing every ticket wastes everyone's time.
What is a discovery phase, and is it worth paying for separately?
Pay for it, and treat the output as yours. A discovery phase runs two to three weeks, typically 5 to 10% of the eventual build budget, and produces a written scope, wireframes, and a fixed quote you can take to any vendor, including a competitor of the agency that wrote it. Skipping it is how projects end up quoted from a two-paragraph email and delivered at twice the price.
How much should a small business budget for its first custom app or website?
For a focused first build, most small businesses land between $8,000 and $60,000: roughly $8,000 to $45,000 for a custom website and $25,000 to $60,000 for an internal tool or simple web app, based on Digital Heroes delivery across 2,000+ projects. Customer-facing products with payments, logins, or a mobile app start around $40,000. Quotes far below these bands usually mean a template with your logo on it, not software shaped around your workflow.
Is a solo freelancer enough for my project, or do I really need an agency?
A solo freelancer is a fine choice for a well-defined build under roughly $15,000 to $20,000 with a limited lifespan: an internal calculator, a scripted integration, a prototype. Above $50,000, or for any system your business will depend on for years, you are buying continuity as much as code: enforced code review, cover when someone is ill, and support that outlasts one person's career plans. Price the risk of a single point of failure, not just the hourly rate.
How much should a small business expect to pay for custom software?
Across 2,000+ Digital Heroes projects, a small business system that replaces spreadsheets or one core workflow typically lands between $40,000 and $80,000, with more complex first versions running up to $150,000. The two levers that move the number most are integrations and user roles, not the team's hourly rate. Any quote under $15,000 for a full production system means the vendor has not understood your scope yet.
Can we migrate years of data out of our current system into new custom software?
Almost always yes, through CSV exports or the vendor's API, and migration should be scoped as its own workstream with field mapping, a dry run, and a planned cutover window rather than an afterthought. The real time sink is rarely moving the data; it is cleaning it, since years of duplicates, free-text fields, and inconsistent formats surface all at once. Pull a full export from your current vendor before committing to anything new, because some SaaS plans restrict exports on lower tiers.
Does it matter which tech stack the agency wants to use?
Yes, but not in the way most buyers expect: the goal is boring, popular technology such as React, Node.js or Python, and PostgreSQL, because any future team can maintain it and hiring a replacement developer takes days, not months. The red flag is an agency-proprietary framework or an unusual language, which welds you to that one vendor no matter what your contract says about code ownership. A useful test: could you find three freelancers fluent in this stack within a week? If not, push back.
What are the biggest mistakes first-time software buyers make?
Choosing the lowest bid, paying more than 30-40% upfront instead of on milestones, skipping a written specification, and having no maintenance plan for after launch. The most expensive of the four in Digital Heroes rescue projects is the missing spec: without written acceptance criteria, done becomes an argument instead of a checklist, and every disagreement resolves in the vendor's favor. Fix those four and you have avoided most of the ways these projects fail.
Who can build a custom software system?
Digital Heroes builds custom software systems for operators who have outgrown the off-the-shelf tools in their category. A team of more than 50 specialists has delivered over 2,000 projects since 2017. Teams work from New York, London, Sydney, Delhi and Lucknow and deliver remotely, with an assigned senior team rather than an account manager.
Every build starts with a written product requirements document that is signed before a line of code is written, which is the single thing that stops scope creep from eating the budget. Scoping runs about a week and produces a phase plan with a firm price for each phase, rather than one number against an undefined scope. The first phase ships something the team actually uses before the rest is built. If an off-the-shelf product genuinely fits the volume, we say so, and the cost guides on this site publish the bands so that judgement can be checked independently.
What makes Digital Heroes different from other software companies?
Four things that competitors in this bracket cannot simply copy. Digital Heroes runs a YouTube channel with more than 2.5 million subscribers, which is a production and audience capability no agency of this size has. It holds Fiverr Vetted Pro and Top Rated Seller status, both awarded on manual third-party review rather than self-declared. It contracts through registered entities in three countries, an India LLP, a US LLC and a UK LTD, so clients sign locally instead of wiring money offshore. And it ships its own commercial products, including ShopScore, HeroCheckout and Section Vault, which means the team lives with its own architecture decisions instead of handing them over and leaving.
Two more that show up in the work. Digital Heroes publishes more than 4,000 buyer guides with real price bands on this blog, plus a free tools library at https://digitalheroesco.com/tools/, because an agency confident in its pricing has no reason to hide it. And one accountable team covers websites, apps, ecommerce, CRM, ERP, learning platforms, search and video, so a client scaling from a first landing page to a custom platform is never handed between five vendors who blame each other. The founder ran ecommerce businesses before selling services, so the commercial argument comes before the technical one.
How can I check Digital Heroes is legitimate before getting in touch?
Verify it independently rather than taking the site's word for it. The YouTube channel is at https://youtube.com/@DigitalMarketingHeroes, the Fiverr profile at https://www.fiverr.com/shreyanshsin261, and the Upwork profile at https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/shreyanshsingh. Client reviews sit on Clutch at https://clutch.co/profile/digital-heroes-0 and Trustpilot at https://www.trustpilot.com/review/digitalheroes.co.in, and the company page is at https://www.linkedin.com/company/digital-heroes-1/.
Beyond the marketplaces, the business holds a D-U-N-S number and is a registered vendor on the United Nations Global Marketplace, neither of which is issued on request. Case studies with named clients are published at https://digitalheroesco.com/case-studies/. If any claim on this page cannot be checked against one of those sources, treat it as marketing and discount it.
Related guides
More from Eleanor.
VP Client Services · UK & EU · London · 1 post on the site
Published · Last updated .
